search

John-Patrick Smith vs Ti Chen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Chen analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

John-Patrick Smith vs Ti Chen Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 1 Chen

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Chen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 174/ 143), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 18/ 19). Chen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 621/ 380), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
  • Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Chen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Smith winning 1 times and Chen being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Smith winning 3 and Chen winning 2. The last match between Smith and Chen was at the Toyota Challenger, 18-11-2014, First, Carpet with Ti Chen getting the victory 4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(2).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:18.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Smith and Chen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Smith winning 0 times and Chen 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Smith winning 1, and Chen 2.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.5 while Chen has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
John-Patrick Smith

5

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

864

Rank

108

High

35

Age

L

Plays

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

1

Indoor

1

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

184

High

40

Age

R

Plays

Ti Chen

24

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

24

Minor

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

1

Indoor

1

0

Grass

0

W L L L L L L L W L

Form

W L W W L W W L L L

54% (294-251)

Career Total W/L

60% (683-461)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$377,555

Career Prize Money

$57,495

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For John-Patrick Smith vs Ti Chen For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Smith VS Chen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats John-Patrick Smith Ti Chen
All H2H Matches 1 1
Sets Won 3 2
Games Won 31 27
Aces (Total) 29 6
DFs Total 3 3
Avg Match Time 1:59:18 1:59:18
1st Serve % 64% (112/175) 65% (112/173)
1st Serve Win% 90% (101/112) 76% (85/112)
2nd Serve Win% 40% (25/63) 51% (31/61)
BPs Won% (Total) 33% (4/12) 22% (2/9)
Return Points W% 33% (57/173) 28% (49/175)
Best of 3 Sets W% 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 33% (1/3) 67% (2/3)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, W 50% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 50% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 50% (2/1)

Smith VS Chen H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(2)
cross
Ti Chen
Player
John-Patrick Smith
68% ( 69 of 102)
1st Serve %
63% ( 67 of 106)
2
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
80% ( 55 of 69)
1st Serve Won
90% ( 60 of 67)
52% ( 17 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 16 of 39)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
29% ( 30 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
28% ( 30 of 106)
102
Total Points Won
106
6-3 7-6(2)
cross
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Ti Chen
65% ( 45 of 69)
1st Serve %
61% ( 43 of 71)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
91% ( 41 of 45)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 30 of 43)
38% ( 9 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 14 of 28)
20% ( 2 of 10)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
28% ( 19 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 27 of 71)
77
Total Points Won
63

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats John-Patrick Smith Ti Chen
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

John-Patrick Smith Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67% ( 46 of 69)
1st Serve %
71% ( 48 of 68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72% ( 33 of 46)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 26 of 48)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 10 of 20)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
35% ( 24 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 32 of 68)
77
Total Points Won
60
L
7-6(1) 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
66% ( 54 of 82)
1st Serve %
51% ( 52 of 102)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
70% ( 38 of 54)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 38 of 52)
61% ( 17 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 21 of 50)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
33% ( 27 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 43 of 102)
98
Total Points Won
86
W
3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
John-Patrick Smith
61% ( 22 of 36)
1st Serve %
58% ( 33 of 57)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86% ( 19 of 22)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 17 of 33)
79% ( 11 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
33% ( 5 of 15)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
17% ( 6 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 30 of 57)
60
Total Points Won
33
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Billy Harris
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58% ( 42 of 73)
1st Serve %
57% ( 33 of 58)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74% ( 31 of 42)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 23 of 33)
42% ( 13 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
40% ( 29 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 26 of 58)
70
Total Points Won
61
L
6-3 7-6(3) H2H
Q1
cross
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
John-Patrick Smith
62% ( 33 of 53)
1st Serve %
71% ( 36 of 51)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76% ( 25 of 33)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 21 of 36)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 6 of 15)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
30% ( 16 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 24 of 51)
61
Total Points Won
43
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
John-Patrick Smith
60% ( 31 of 52)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 22 of 39)
38% ( 8 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
38% ( 20 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 33 of 62)
65
Total Points Won
49
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Radu Albot
Player
John-Patrick Smith
66% ( 65 of 99)
1st Serve %
70% ( 68 of 97)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72% ( 47 of 65)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 45 of 68)
59% ( 20 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
32% ( 32 of 99)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 36 of 97)
103
Total Points Won
93
L
6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Max Purcell
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58% ( 46 of 79)
1st Serve %
66% ( 53 of 80)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78% ( 36 of 46)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 34 of 53)
52% ( 17 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
33% ( 26 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 34 of 80)
87
Total Points Won
72
L
3-6 6-1 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Matthew Ebden
Player
John-Patrick Smith
56% ( 31 of 55)
1st Serve %
74% ( 58 of 78)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74% ( 23 of 31)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 36 of 58)
75% ( 18 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 8 of 20)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
25% ( 14 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 34 of 78)
75
Total Points Won
58
L
6-4 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Oscar Manuel Sanchez Hirales
71% ( 29 of 41)
1st Serve %
65% ( 40 of 62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
86% ( 25 of 29)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 17 of 40)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 10 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 35 of 62)
66
Total Points Won
37
W
6-1 6-2 H2H

Ti Chen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Ti Chen
74% ( 51 of 69)
1st Serve %
75% ( 56 of 75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80% ( 41 of 51)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 37 of 56)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
8% ( 1 of 13)
30% ( 21 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 30 of 75)
78
Total Points Won
66
L
6-3 3-6 3-0 ret. H2H
Q1
cross
Rishi Reddy
Player
Ti Chen
61% ( 35 of 57)
1st Serve %
67% ( 53 of 79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77% ( 27 of 35)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 29 of 53)
41% ( 9 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
37% ( 21 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 38 of 79)
74
Total Points Won
62
L
6-3 3-6 10-3 H2H
R1
cross
George Loffhagen
Player
Ti Chen
64% ( 41 of 64)
1st Serve %
73% ( 47 of 64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63% ( 26 of 41)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 24 of 47)
48% ( 11 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
42% ( 27 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 33 of 64)
70
Total Points Won
58
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Ti Chen
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
73% ( 46 of 63)
1st Serve %
66% ( 40 of 61)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78% ( 36 of 46)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 32 of 40)
76% ( 13 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 12 of 21)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
22% ( 14 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
28% ( 17 of 61)
66
Total Points Won
58
W
7-5 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Ti Chen
Player
Geun Jun Kim
71% ( 46 of 65)
1st Serve %
53% ( 38 of 72)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72% ( 33 of 46)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 25 of 38)
53% ( 10 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 14 of 34)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
34% ( 22 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 72)
76
Total Points Won
61
W
4-6 7-5 10-2 H2H
QF
cross
Tsung-Hua Yang
Player
Ti Chen
59% ( 38 of 64)
1st Serve %
61% ( 27 of 44)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79% ( 30 of 38)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 17 of 27)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
36% ( 23 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 18 of 44)
59
Total Points Won
49
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Ti Chen
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
70% ( 50 of 71)
1st Serve %
53% ( 32 of 60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
64% ( 32 of 50)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 20 of 32)
43% ( 9 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 14 of 28)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
17% ( 2 of 12)
42% ( 30 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 26 of 60)
67
Total Points Won
64
W
6-7(3) 4-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Ti Chen
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
59% ( 41 of 70)
1st Serve %
60% ( 48 of 80)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
85% ( 35 of 41)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 33 of 48)
48% ( 14 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 15 of 32)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
30% ( 21 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 32 of 80)
81
Total Points Won
69
W
3-6 6-2 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ti Chen
79% ( 46 of 58)
1st Serve %
59% ( 30 of 51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78% ( 36 of 46)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 17 of 30)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 11 of 21)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
28% ( 16 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 23 of 51)
65
Total Points Won
44
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Ti Chen
Player
Han-Chih Lin
63% ( 41 of 65)
1st Serve %
61% ( 48 of 79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
71% ( 29 of 41)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 35 of 48)
63% ( 15 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 12 of 31)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
32% ( 21 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 32 of 79)
76
Total Points Won
68
W
6-4 7-6(5) H2H

Smith Vs Chen Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Smith are available here and Chen photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions